In answer to Silvia
			Archive

Posted by: Sir Dave ® 01/16/2004, 16:42:30

I replied to your post, Silvia but my reply doesn't show up in the index, so I'm putting it here: The audience are the people who read these forums.  How can you fight back against people who are going to harrass your employers?   Harrass theirs?  There will be a case for libel action that can be taken but only if the harrassers are not anonymous and I suspect they will be anonymous. The only thing anyone can do is show the audience what is happening.  They will make their own judgements. Modified by Sir Dave at Fri, Jan 16, 2004, 17:11:43

| Recommend | Alert

Previous | Next | Current page

Replies to this message

That is obvious Re: In answer to Silvia -- Sir Dave Top of thread Archive Posted by: Silvia ® 01/16/2004, 20:30:33 DAVE: The audience are the people who read these forums.  How can you fight back against people who are going to harrass your employers?   Harrass theirs?  There will be a case for libel action that can be taken but only if the harrassers are not anonymous and I suspect they will be anonymous. The only thing anyone can do is show the audience what is happening.  They will make their own judgements. You are right: That is how many of us left the cult, by reading around! When I had just exited the cult I saved lots of posts and your was one of them.  Looking for a CD yesterday I found a EPO CD with posts and there was yours. We cannot forget were we are coming from. It's important to have a life but for some of us, it's important to continue to have a voice against "Vadder".  I'm glad to see that you are supporting Roger as we supported you when YOU were harrassed. I don't agree though that there is nothing else to be done.  I will not give advantage saying anything else.  I'm changing tactics.... Best Regards | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page What isn't so obvious Re: That is obvious -- Silvia Top of thread Archive Posted by: Sir Dave ® 01/17/2004, 00:35:31 If you were to mean that what could be done is to attack premies, I'd disagree with that.  In this war, non-aggression wins the day.  It's a war of public opinion and if ex-premies act aggressively towards premies, it is counterproductive in my view. Modified by Sir Dave at Sat, Jan 17, 2004, 00:37:56 | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page Dave, that is really wise! Re: What isn't so obvious -- Sir Dave Top of thread Archive Posted by: JHB ® 01/17/2004, 04:23:47 Dave, I actually agree with you 100%. I would also add that if ex-premies act aggressively towards ex-premies, it is equally counterproductive. John. | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page attack premies? Re: What isn't so obvious -- Sir Dave Top of thread Archive Posted by: Silvia ® 01/17/2004, 09:29:15 No Dave, not at all.  I dislike fighting. I still want maharaji to respond and to be brought to light further; that is what my words meant.  He offended me deeply in many ways. I do not attack premies in a personal level but rather their ideas, when I consider them to be wrong as it happens when they want to deffend M.'s cult/operations, or deny that it's a destructive cult. The "star" here is maharaji's past and present and how and why he tooked us for a ride, and also, how he is still recruiting people into the cult with his innocent gift offer facade.  In reality, his latest facade is a trying-to-escape-from-EPO but that is not possible.  All is catching up with him and the fanatics premies who still believe he is God don't like it. I agree with what JHB posted to you.   Rawat was my "Lord and saviour" from 1974 until 1999.   | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page Spot on, Sir Dave Re: What isn't so obvious -- Sir Dave Top of thread Archive Posted by: Neville B ® 01/17/2004, 18:05:11 | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous |   | Current page